Macquarie Home | Course Handbook | Library | Campus Map | Macquarie Contacts
Home page

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home
Add
-List Of Titles -A Comparative analysis of simulated and observed photosynthetic CO2 uptake in two coniferous forest canopies

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/90686

OpenURL Link
17 Visitors 18 Hits 0 Downloads
Title
A Comparative analysis of simulated and observed photosynthetic CO2 uptake in two coniferous forest canopies
Related
Tree physiology, Vol. 26, No. 7 (2006), p.845-864
DOI
10.1093/treephys/26.7.845
Publisher
Heron Publishing
Date
2006
FoR/RFCD Code(s)
070500 Forestry Sciences
Author/Creator
Ibrom, Andreas
Author/Creator
Jarvis, Paul G
Author/Creator
Clement, Robert
Author/Creator
Morgenstern, Kai
Author/Creator
Oltchev, Alexander
Author/Creator
Medlyn, Belinda E
Author/Creator
Wang, Ying Ping
Author/Creator
Wingate, Lisa
Author/Creator
Moncrieff, John B
Author/Creator
Gravenhorst, Gode
Description
Gross canopy photosynthesis (Pg) can be simulated with canopy models or retrieved from turbulent carbon dioxide (CO2) flux measurements above the forest canopy. We compare the two estimates and illustrate our findings with two case studies. We used the three-dimensional canopy model MAESTRA to simulate Pg of two spruce forests differing in age and structure. Model parameter acquisition and model sensitivity to selected model parameters are described, and modeled results are compared with independent flux estimates. Despite higher photon fluxes at the site, an older German Norway spruce (Picea abies L. (Karst.)) canopy took up 25% less CO2 from the atmosphere than a young Scottish Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) plantation. The average magnitudes of Pg and the differences between the two canopies were satisfactorily represented by the model. The main reasons for the different uptake rates were a slightly smaller quantum yield and lower absorptance of the Norway spruce stand because of a more clumped canopy structure. The model did not represent the scatter in the turbulent CO2 flux densities, which was of the same order of magnitude as the non-photosynthetically-active-radiation-induced biophysical variability in the simulated Pg. Analysis of residuals identified only small systematic differences between the modeled flux estimates and turbulent flux measurements at high vapor pressure saturation deficits. The merits and limitations of comparative analysis for quality evaluation of both methods are discussed. From this analysis, we recommend use of both parameter sets and model structure as a basis for future applications and model development.
Description
20 page(s)
Subject Keyword
070500 Forestry Sciences
Subject Keyword
canopy photosynthesis model
Subject Keyword
carbon dioxide fluxes
Subject Keyword
eddy correlation
Subject Keyword
MAESTRA
Subject Keyword
Picea abies
Subject Keyword
Picea sitchensis
Resource Type
journal article
Organisation
Macquarie University. Dept. of Biological Sciences

Identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/90686
Identifier
ISSN:1758-4469
Identifier
mq-rm-2006011633
Language
eng
Reviewed
Reviewed
Save/E-mail Citation
Citation Format
E-mail Address
Subject
"Tree physiology"
 
OR
  • Show All  
  • Show My Selections 
Advanced Search

Search

carbon dioxide fluxes

Browse

  • By Title 
  • By Author/Creator 
  • By Department/Centre 
  • By Subject Keyword 
  • By Journal/Conference 
  • By FoR/RFCD codes 
  • By Resource Type 
  • By Date 

Highlights

  • Most Accessed Objects 
  • Recent Additions 
  • Pending Publications 
  • Author Profiles 

Resources

  • About ResearchOnline 
  • FAQ 
  • Open Access 
  • Open Access-FAQs 
  • Copyright 
  • Contribute 
  • Help 
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions 
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Powered by VITAL

Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J

Library Staff Sign In