Correct responses, error analyses and theories of word production : a response to Martin | Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/9161

29 Visitors

32 Hits

1 Downloads

File	Description	Size	Format
DS01	Author final version	97 KB	Adobe Acrobat PDF	View/Open

Title: Correct responses, error analyses and theories of word production : a response to Martin
Related: Cognitive neuropsychology, Vol. 21, Issue 5, p.531-536
DOI: 10.1080/02643290442000059
Publisher: Psychology Press
Date: 2004
Author/Creator: Nickels, Lyndsey
Author/Creator: Howard, David
Description: Nickels and Howard (2003) argued that effects of word length on correct responses of a case series of nine aphasic individuals could be accounted for entirely in terms of number of phonemes, and suggested that effects of complexity on correct responses may have been overstated in the literature. In a commentary on this paper, N. Martin, disputed some of Nickels & Howard’s claims focusing on methodological issues concerning the differences between analysis of errors and correct productions, and the implications of this study for theoretical accounts of word production. Here we respond to those points raised.
Description: 6 page(s)
Subject Keyword: cognitive neuropsychology
Subject Keyword: cognitive psychology
Resource Type: journal article
Organisation: Macquarie University. Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science

Macquarie University ResearchOnline