Macquarie Home | Course Handbook | Library | Campus Map | Macquarie Contacts
Home page

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home
Add
-List Of Titles -An Investigation of the forces used by clinicians to open space with coil springs

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/26872

OpenURL Link
22 Visitors 23 Hits 0 Downloads
Title
An Investigation of the forces used by clinicians to open space with coil springs
Related
Australian orthodontic journal, Vol. 22, Issue 2, p.115-120
Related
http://www.aso.org.au/AOJ/AOJ_docs/AOJ.htm
Publisher
The Australian Society of Orthodontists
Date
2006
Author/Creator
Steinbach, Gregor
Author/Creator
Armstrong, David
Author/Creator
Kharbanda, Om P
Author/Creator
Petocz, Peter
Author/Creator
Darendeliler, M. Ali
Description
Aims: To determine the forces applied by coil springs used to open spaces for blocked out lateral incisors, and to compare the actual forces used with clinicans’ concepts of an ‘ideal’ force. Methods: Twelve postgraduate orthodontic students (7M, 5F) and 12 orthodontic tutors (9M, 3F) participated in this study. They were asked to state what they considered was an ideal orthodontic force, and then to cut appropriate lengths of stainless steel and nickel titanium open coil springs to open spaces for blocked out maxillary and mandibular permanent lateral incisors on a typodont set-up. The forces generated by the open coil springs were measured and compared to the stated ideal forces. Results: The mean ideal force was 76.75 g (Range: 25–200 g). The mean applied force was 314 g (Range: 21–519 g). There were no significant differences in the forces used by the male and female postgraduates, but the male tutors used a significantly higher force than the male postgraduate students (p = 0.007) and the female tutors (p < 0.001). The female tutors used a significantly lower force than the female postgraduates (p = 0.024) and the male postgraduates (p = 0.003). Higher forces were produced by the stainless steel coil springs in both arches (Maxillary arch: p = 0.007; Mandibular arch: p < 0.005). Conclusions: The clinicians could not agree on an ideal force to open spaces for blocked out lateral incisors. There were substantial differences between the forces applied by the coil springs and the forces considered by the clinicians to be ideal. There were large differences in the forces used by the different groups of orthodontists.
Description
6 page(s)
Resource Type
journal article
Organisation
Macquarie University. Dept. of Statistics

Identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/26872
Identifier
ISSN:0587-3908
Identifier
mq-rm-2006004651
Language
eng
Reviewed
Reviewed
Save/E-mail Citation
Citation Format
E-mail Address
Subject
"Australian orthodontic journal"
 
OR
  • Show All  
  • Show My Selections 
Advanced Search

Search

Darendeliler, M. Ali
Petocz, Peter

Browse

  • By Title 
  • By Author/Creator 
  • By Department/Centre 
  • By Subject Keyword 
  • By Journal/Conference 
  • By FoR/RFCD codes 
  • By Resource Type 
  • By Date 

Highlights

  • Most Accessed Objects 
  • Recent Additions 
  • Pending Publications 
  • Author Profiles 

Resources

  • About ResearchOnline 
  • FAQ 
  • Open Access 
  • Open Access-FAQs 
  • Copyright 
  • Contribute 
  • Help 
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions 
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Powered by VITAL

Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J

Library Staff Sign In