Macquarie Home | Course Handbook | Library | Campus Map | Macquarie Contacts
Home page

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home
Add
-List Of Titles -Evaluation of AMIP II global climate model simulations of the land surface water budget and its components over the GEWEX-CEOP regions

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/22023

OpenURL Link
44 Visitors 47 Hits 0 Downloads
Title
Evaluation of AMIP II global climate model simulations of the land surface water budget and its components over the GEWEX-CEOP regions
Related
Journal of hydrometeorology, Vol. 8, Issue 3, p.304-326
DOI
10.1175/JHM579.1
Publisher
American Meteorolgical Society
Date
2007
Author/Creator
Irannejad, P
Author/Creator
Henderson-Sellers, A.
Description
The land surface water balance components simulated by 20 atmospheric global circulation models (AGCMs) participating in phase II of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP II) are analyzed globally and over seven Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment Coordinated Enhanced Observing Period basins. In contrast to the conclusions from analysis of AMIP I, the results presented here suggest that the group average of available AGCMs does not outperform all individual AGCMs in simulating the surface water balance components. Analysis shows that the available reanalysis products are not appropriate for evaluation of AGCMs’ simulated land surface water components. The worst simulation of the surface water budget is in the Murray–Darling, the most arid basin, where all the reanalyses and seven of the AGCMs produce a negative surface water budget, with evaporation alone exceeding precipitation and soil moisture decreasing over the whole AMIP II period in this basin. The spatiotemporal correlation coefficients between observed and AGCM-simulated runoff are smaller than those for precipitation. In almost all basins (except for the two most arid basins), the spatiotemporal variations of the AGCMs’ simulated evaporation are more coherent and agree better with observations, compared to those of simulated precipitation. This suggests that differences among the AGCMs’ surface water budget predictions are not solely due to model-generated precipitation differences. Specifically, it is shown that different land surface parameterization schemes partition precipitation between evaporation and runoff differently and that this, in addition to the predicted differences in atmospheric forcings, is responsible for different predictions of basin-scale water budgets. The authors conclude that the selection of a land surface scheme for an atmospheric model has significant impacts on the predicted continental and basin-scale surface hydrology.
Description
23 page(s)
Subject Keyword
water balance (hydrology)
Subject Keyword
hydrologic cycle
Subject Keyword
runoff
Subject Keyword
urban runoff
Subject Keyword
forecasting
Subject Keyword
atmospheric pressure
Resource Type
journal article
Organisation
Macquarie University. Dept. of Physical Geography

Identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/22023
Identifier
ISSN:1525-7541
Identifier
mq-rm-2007002109
Language
eng
Reviewed
Reviewed
Save/E-mail Citation
Citation Format
E-mail Address
Subject
"Journal of hydrometeorology"
 
OR
  • Show All  
  • Show My Selections 
Advanced Search

Search

water balance (hydrology)

Browse

  • By Title 
  • By Author/Creator 
  • By Department/Centre 
  • By Subject Keyword 
  • By Journal/Conference 
  • By FoR/RFCD codes 
  • By Resource Type 
  • By Date 

Highlights

  • Most Accessed Objects 
  • Recent Additions 
  • Pending Publications 
  • Author Profiles 

Resources

  • About ResearchOnline 
  • FAQ 
  • Open Access 
  • Open Access-FAQs 
  • Copyright 
  • Contribute 
  • Help 
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions 
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Powered by VITAL

Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J

Library Staff Sign In