Macquarie Home | Course Handbook | Library | Campus Map | Macquarie Contacts
Home page

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home
Add
-List Of Titles -The Admissability of expert opinion economic evidence in judicial review

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/20012

OpenURL Link
170 Visitors 219 Hits 12 Downloads
FileDescriptionSizeFormat
DS01Publisher version (open access)187 KBAdobe Acrobat PDFView/Open
Title
The Admissability of expert opinion economic evidence in judicial review
Related
Macquarie journal of business law, Vol. 3, p.63-77
Related
http://www.buslaw.mq.edu.au/MqJBL/papers/volume_3/07_dahdal.pdf
Publisher
Macquarie University, Division of Law
Date
2006
FoR/RFCD Code(s)
180103 Administrative Law  180105 Commercial and Contract Law  180123 Litigation, Adjudication and Dispute Resolution
Author/Creator
Dahdal, Andrew
Description
This paper deals with the growing prevalence of economic evidence in judicial review proceedings in Australian courts. It examines the limitations imposed upon the admissibility of such evidence through the rules of evidence, at common law and the uniform Evidence Act, and the nature of judicial review actions. In considering two recent Federal Court cases where economic evidence was an integral component of the judicial review action, this paper suggests that despite the intricate rules now imposed upon the admissibility of expert opinion evidence, the main obstacle to the admissibility of expert economic evidence in judicial review actions is the incompatibility of determinative economic perspectives and the need for the court to refrain from merits review. Thus it would seem that the introduction of technical economic evidence in a judicial review proceeding runs a dual risk of being inadmissible for either not furnishing with sufficient clarity the foundations of the expert opinion proffered, or if the expert opinion is perceived as being too conclusive in its assertions it may also be inadmissible as going to the merits of the original decision the legality of which is the sole concern of the court reviewing the decision. Should the correct balance be found, expert economic opinion evidence is admissible in judicial review actions.
Description
15 page(s)
Subject Keyword
180103 Administrative Law
Subject Keyword
180105 Commercial and Contract Law
Subject Keyword
180123 Litigation, Adjudication and Dispute Resolution
Subject Keyword
law
Subject Keyword
economics
Resource Type
Macquarie Journal Of Business Law Collection
Resource Type
journal article
Organisation
Macquarie University. Dept. of Business Law

Identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/20012
Identifier
ISSN:1449-0269
Identifier
mq-rm-2006001485
Language
eng
Rights
Publisher version archived with the permission of the Dean, Division of Law, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia. This copy is available for individual, non-commercial use. Permission to reprint/republish this version for other uses must be obtained from the publisher.
Full Text
Full Text
Reviewed
Reviewed
 
Image Thumbnail
Save/E-mail Citation
Citation Format
E-mail Address
Subject
"Macquarie journal of business law"
 
OR
  • Show All  
  • Show My Selections 
Advanced Search

Search

Macquarie Journal Of Business Law Collection
Dahdal, Andrew

Browse

  • By Title 
  • By Author/Creator 
  • By Department/Centre 
  • By Subject Keyword 
  • By Journal/Conference 
  • By FoR/RFCD codes 
  • By Resource Type 
  • By Date 

Highlights

  • Most Accessed Objects 
  • Recent Additions 
  • Pending Publications 
  • Author Profiles 

Resources

  • About ResearchOnline 
  • FAQ 
  • Open Access 
  • Open Access-FAQs 
  • Copyright 
  • Contribute 
  • Help 
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions 
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Powered by VITAL

Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J

Library Staff Sign In