Macquarie Home | Course Handbook | Library | Campus Map | Macquarie Contacts
Home page

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home
Add
-List Of Titles -Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/190223

OpenURL Link
24 Visitors 29 Hits 0 Downloads
Title
Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status
Related
Journal of clinical epidemiology, Vol. 63, Issue 7, (2010), p.760-766
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009
Publisher
Elsevier
Date
2010
Author/Creator
Kamper, Steven J
Author/Creator
Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G
Author/Creator
Knol, Dirk L
Author/Creator
Maher, Christopher G
Author/Creator
de Vet, Henrica C. W
Author/Creator
Hancock, Mark J
Description
Objective: The study investigated the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Study Design and Setting: Data from seven clinical studies including 861 subjects were used for the analyses. Repeat measures taken at the same attendance and from attendances separated by 24 hours were compared to estimate test-retest reliability. Construct validity was evaluated by examining relationships between pre, post, and change scores in pain and disability measures with GPE measures. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient values of 0.90-0.99 indicate excellent reproducibility of the GPE scale. In all but one data set, change scores on pain and disability measures correlated well (r = 0.40-0.74) with GPE; however, post scores nearly always correlated even more strongly (r = 0.58-0.84), and pre scores showed much weaker association (r = 0.00-0.28). Pre scores accounted for only a small amount of additional R2 when added to regression models including post score. Conclusions: Test-retest reliability of the GPE is excellent. GPE ratings are strongly influenced by current status, with the effect more obvious as transition time lengthens. This result questions whether transition ratings truly reflect change, or rather just current state. This finding also has implications for the use of GPE ratings as an external criterion of change in clinimetric studies. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Description
7 page(s)
Subject Keyword
Global Perceived Effect
Subject Keyword
Outcome measure
Subject Keyword
Transition rating
Resource Type
journal article
Organisation
Macquarie University. Dept. of Health Professions

Identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/190223
Identifier
ISSN:0895-4356
Identifier
mq_res-ext-2-s2.0-77952421365
Language
eng
Reviewed
Reviewed
Save/E-mail Citation
Citation Format
E-mail Address
Subject
"Journal of clinical epidemiology"
 
OR
  • Show All  
  • Show My Selections 
Advanced Search

Search

Browse

  • By Title 
  • By Author/Creator 
  • By Department/Centre 
  • By Subject Keyword 
  • By Journal/Conference 
  • By FoR/RFCD codes 
  • By Resource Type 
  • By Date 

Highlights

  • Most Accessed Objects 
  • Recent Additions 
  • Pending Publications 
  • Author Profiles 

Resources

  • About ResearchOnline 
  • FAQ 
  • Open Access 
  • Open Access-FAQs 
  • Copyright 
  • Contribute 
  • Help 
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions 
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Powered by VITAL

Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J

Library Staff Sign In