Macquarie Home | Course Handbook | Library | Campus Map | Macquarie Contacts
Home page

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home
Add
-List Of Titles -Australia’s new bilateral investment treaty stance : an open amicus curiae submission

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/164773

OpenURL Link
233 Visitors 328 Hits 38 Downloads
FileDescriptionSizeFormat
DS01Publisher version (open access)414 KBAdobe Acrobat PDFView/Open
Title
Australia’s new bilateral investment treaty stance : an open amicus curiae submission
Related
Macquarie journal of business law, Vol. 9, (2012), p.30-51
Related
http://www.businessandeconomics.mq.edu.au/faculty_docs/research2/macquarie_journal_of_business_law/04Ayad_ed1final.pdf
Publisher
Macquarie University
Date
2012
Author/Creator
Ayad, Mary B
Description
The recent Australian Parliamentary Commission’s stance that any new Bilateral Investment Treaties (hereinafter referred to as ‘BIT’s) entered into by Australia will no longer contain an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clause normally calling for international arbitration or a hybrid method of international arbitration and mediation. Throughout the modern history of Bilateral Investment Treaty Law, the ADR clause has been an essential component and is the legal manifestation of the entire raison d’être of the BIT; which exists to protect investors whether they are individual or state parties. This new stance contradicts the historical precedent in BIT interpretation and practise. Furthermore, it poses significant adjudicatory risk for Australian investors who sign contracts with state parties under these new BIT provisions, putting them at risk for unfavourable court intervention. Additionally, the image of Australia as a safe party to investment contracts and as a neutral haven for arbitration is compromised because the adjudicatory risk of dealing with Australian investors under these new provisions opens the door to potentially unfavourable perceptions of court intervention as well. Australia will be signing a multilateral treaty with a number of Asian countries whose legal systems and court decisions may be unknown to Australian practitioners. The Productivity Commission’s stance is highly unfavourable to Australian interests and should be revised or withdrawn.
Description
22 page(s)
Resource Type
Macquarie Journal Of Business Law Collection
Resource Type
journal article
Organisation
Macquarie University. Dept. of Accounting and Corporate Governance

Identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/164773
Identifier
ISSN:1449-0269
Identifier
mq-rm-2011005559
Identifier
mq_res-20120418-120719
Language
eng
Rights
Publisher version archived with the permission of the Dean, Division of Law, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia. This copy is available for individual, non-commercial use. Permission to reprint/republish this version for other uses must be obtained from the publisher.
Full Text
Full Text
Reviewed
Reviewed
 
Image Thumbnail
Save/E-mail Citation
Citation Format
E-mail Address
Subject
"Macquarie journal of business law"
 
OR
  • Show All  
  • Show My Selections 
Advanced Search

Search

Browse

  • By Title 
  • By Author/Creator 
  • By Department/Centre 
  • By Subject Keyword 
  • By Journal/Conference 
  • By FoR/RFCD codes 
  • By Resource Type 
  • By Date 

Highlights

  • Most Accessed Objects 
  • Recent Additions 
  • Pending Publications 
  • Author Profiles 

Resources

  • About ResearchOnline 
  • FAQ 
  • Open Access 
  • Open Access-FAQs 
  • Copyright 
  • Contribute 
  • Help 
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions 
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Powered by VITAL

Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J

Library Staff Sign In