Macquarie Home | Course Handbook | Library | Campus Map | Macquarie Contacts
Home page

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home
Add
-List Of Titles -Is productivity of mesic savannas light limited or water limited? Results of a simulation study

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/161103

OpenURL Link
7 Visitors 8 Hits 0 Downloads
Title
Is productivity of mesic savannas light limited or water limited? Results of a simulation study
Related
Global change biology, Vol. 17, No. 10, (2011), p.3130-3149
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02425.x
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Date
2011
Author/Creator
Whitley, Rhys J
Author/Creator
Macinnis-Ng, Catriona M. O
Author/Creator
Hutley, Lindsay B
Author/Creator
Beringer, Jason
Author/Creator
Zeppel, Melanie
Author/Creator
Williams, Mathew
Author/Creator
Taylor, Daniel
Author/Creator
Eamus, Derek
Description
A soil-plant-atmosphere model was used to estimate gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) of a tropical savanna in Australia. This paper describes model modifications required to simulate the substantial C4 grass understory together with C3 trees. The model was further improved to include a seasonal distribution of leaf area and foliar nitrogen through 10 canopy layers. Model outputs were compared with a 5-year eddy covariance dataset. Adding the C4 photosynthesis component improved the model efficiency and root-mean-squared error (RMSE) for total ecosystem GPP by better emulating annual peaks and troughs in GPP across wet and dry seasons. The C4 photosynthesis component had minimal impact on modelled values of ET. Outputs of GPP from the modified model agreed well with measured values, explaining between 79% and 90% of the variance and having a low RMSE (0.003-0.281gCm-2day-1). Approximately, 40% of total annual GPP was contributed by C4 grasses. Total (trees and grasses) wet season GPP was approximately 75-80% of total annual GPP. Light-use efficiency (LUE) was largest for the wet season and smallest in the dry season and C4 LUE was larger than that of the trees. A sensitivity analysis of GPP revealed that daily GPP was most sensitive to changes in leaf area index (LAI) and foliar nitrogen (Nf) and relatively insensitive to changes in maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax), maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) and minimum leaf water potential (ψmin). The modified model was also able to represent daily and seasonal patterns in ET, (explaining 68-81% of variance) with a low RMSE (0.038-0.19mmday-1). Current values of Nf, LAI and other parameters appear to be colimiting for maximizing GPP. By manipulating LAI and soil moisture content inputs, we show that modelled GPP is limited by light interception rather than water availability at this site.
Description
20 page(s)
Subject Keyword
Evapotranspiration
Subject Keyword
GPP
Subject Keyword
Savannas
Subject Keyword
SPA modelling
Resource Type
journal article
Organisation
Macquarie University. Dept. of Biological Sciences

Identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/161103
Identifier
ISSN:1354-1013
Identifier
mq_res-ext-2-s2.0-80052477774
Language
eng
Reviewed
Reviewed
Save/E-mail Citation
Citation Format
E-mail Address
Subject
"Global change biology"
 
OR
  • Show All  
  • Show My Selections 
Advanced Search

Search

Browse

  • By Title 
  • By Author/Creator 
  • By Department/Centre 
  • By Subject Keyword 
  • By Journal/Conference 
  • By FoR/RFCD codes 
  • By Resource Type 
  • By Date 

Highlights

  • Most Accessed Objects 
  • Recent Additions 
  • Pending Publications 
  • Author Profiles 

Resources

  • About ResearchOnline 
  • FAQ 
  • Open Access 
  • Open Access-FAQs 
  • Copyright 
  • Contribute 
  • Help 
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions 
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Powered by VITAL

Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J

Library Staff Sign In