Macquarie Home | Course Handbook | Library | Campus Map | Macquarie Contacts
Home page

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home
Add
-List Of Titles -Winning ARC grants : comparing accounting with other commerce-related disciplines

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/145791

OpenURL Link
32 Visitors 36 Hits 1 Downloads
Title
Winning ARC grants : comparing accounting with other commerce-related disciplines
Related
Accounting research journal, Vol. 24, Issue 3, (2011), p.213-244
DOI
10.1108/10309611111186984
Publisher
Emerald Group Publishing
Date
2011
Author/Creator
Clarke, Kevin
Author/Creator
Flanagan, Jack
Author/Creator
O'Neill, Sharron
Description
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine whether accounting researchers in Australia more proactively pursued government-sponsored Australian Research Council (ARC) research funding in the post-Enron period than researchers in other commerce-related disciplines. Design/methodology/approach – The study measures disciplinary research activity using successful Australian Research Council Linkage and Discovery grants for the period 2000 to 2008. The study identifies the number of grants received, the total dollar amount funded, the number of participating institutions, individual researchers and (where applicable) partnering organisations. Using these criteria, the study compares the success of accounting with that of banking and finance, economics and business and management. Findings – The study highlights accounting's failure to attain comparable levels of research funding relative to other commerce-related disciplines (both in terms of grants and dollars), even given the public profile of accounting events post-Enron. The study reveals a significantly higher “elite institution effect” exists in accounting and lower levels of academic and commercial partnerships when compared to other disciplines. The study examines potential reasons for the lack of ARC funding won by accounting researchers. Practical implications – The persistently low level of representation of accounting researchers among ARC grant winners during this period appears counterintuitive to the traditional “professional model” that links university-based disciplinary members with practitioners. Why accounting, as a high-profile profession diverges from this model should be of concern to researchers, universities and the accounting profession. Originality/value – The study's use of comparative ARC data extends and contextualises earlier studies that have sought to examine the state of accounting research in Australia.
Description
32 page(s)
Subject Keyword
accounting research
Subject Keyword
Australia
Subject Keyword
Australian Research Council
Subject Keyword
Commonwealth Department of Education
Subject Keyword
employment and workplace relations
Subject Keyword
grants
Subject Keyword
post-Enron period
Subject Keyword
professionalism
Subject Keyword
research grants
Resource Type
journal article
Organisation
Macquarie University. Faculty of Business and Economics

Identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/145791
Identifier
ISSN:1030-9616
Identifier
mq_res-20111129-141843
Language
eng
Reviewed
Reviewed
Save/E-mail Citation
Citation Format
E-mail Address
Subject
"Accounting research journal"
 
OR
  • Show All  
  • Show My Selections 
Advanced Search

Search

Clarke, Kevin

Browse

  • By Title 
  • By Author/Creator 
  • By Department/Centre 
  • By Subject Keyword 
  • By Journal/Conference 
  • By FoR/RFCD codes 
  • By Resource Type 
  • By Date 

Highlights

  • Most Accessed Objects 
  • Recent Additions 
  • Pending Publications 
  • Author Profiles 

Resources

  • About ResearchOnline 
  • FAQ 
  • Open Access 
  • Open Access-FAQs 
  • Copyright 
  • Contribute 
  • Help 
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions 
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Powered by VITAL

Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J

Library Staff Sign In