Commentary on the judgment of the ICTY Appeals Chamber in the case of Prosecutor v. Milorad Krnojelac

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home

List Of Titles

Add to Quick Collection

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/126317

618 Visitors

546 Hits

0 Downloads

Title: Commentary on the judgment of the ICTY Appeals Chamber in the case of Prosecutor v. Milorad Krnojelac
Related: Klip, André and Sluiter, Göran. Annotated leading cases of international criminal tribunals, Vol. 14 : International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 2003, p.841-846
Related: http://www.intersentia.be//Files/Books/Inhoudstafel/9789050957892.pdf
Publisher: Antwerp : Intersentia
Date: 2008
Author/Creator: Zahar, Alexander
Description: The judgment of the ICTY Appeals Chamber in the Krnojelac case in September 2003 underscores the fact that the ICTY Trial Chambers still, at that stage, had no grip on the doctrine of joint criminal enterprise (JCE) that had been cobbled together four years earlier by the Appeals Chamber in the Tadic case. In Krnojelac, the Appeals Chamber once again usurped the role of the Trial Chamber and applied a refurbished JCE doctrine to factual findings it had not itself made. Krnojelac's term of imprisonment was doubled, in this appeal, to 15 years.
Description: 6 page(s)
Subject Keyword: 180100 Law
Subject Keyword: Krnojelac case
Subject Keyword: ICTY
Subject Keyword: joint criminal enterprise
Subject Keyword: Tadic
Resource Type: book chapter
Organisation: Macquarie University. Macquarie Law School

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J