Macquarie Home | Course Handbook | Library | Campus Map | Macquarie Contacts
Home page

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home
Add
-List Of Titles -A Comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/119132

OpenURL Link
58 Visitors 69 Hits 0 Downloads
Title
A Comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer
Related
British journal of ophthalmology, Vol. 91, Issue 10 (2007), p.1285-1287
DOI
10.1136/bjo.2007.114926
Publisher
BMJ Group
Date
2007
FoR/RFCD Code(s)
110300 Clinical Sciences  111300 Ophthalmology and Optometry
Author/Creator
Landers, John
Author/Creator
Sharma, Alok
Author/Creator
Goldberg, Ivan
Author/Creator
Graham, Stuart
Description
Background: Two commonly used perimeters in Australia are the Humphrey Field Analyzer II (HFA) and the Medmont Automated Perimeter (MAP). Each device describes the visual field in terms of numerical values called global indices; however, these values are not interchangeable between devices. This study was designed to directly compare the global indices of HFA and MAP visual fields. Methods: 63 subjects who had suspected glaucoma, ocular hypertension or glaucoma, or were normal controls were recruited selectively. Each patient was tested with the MAP and HFA. Global indices were then compared between tests. These included mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) from the HFA and average defect (AD) and pattern defect (PD) from the MAP. Results: The MD and PSD results were strongly correlated with the AD and PD results, respectively. The relationship between them could be described in terms of two polynomial equations: AD = 0.94+1.31(MD)+0.02(MD)² and PD = 2.21(PSD)–0.05(PSD)²–0.006. These non-linear relationships may be the result of differences in testing method (test stimulus spectrum, number of testing locations or background luminance) or differences in the way each global index was calculated. Conclusion: The AD and PD results obtained from the MAP may be substituted for the MD and PSD results from the HFA after appropriate conversion.
Description
3 page(s)
Subject Keyword
110300 Clinical Sciences
Subject Keyword
111300 Ophthalmology and Optometry
Resource Type
journal article
Organisation
Macquarie University. Australian School of Advanced Medicine

Identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/119132
Identifier
ISSN:0007-1161
Identifier
mq-rm-2008003701
Language
eng
Reviewed
Reviewed
Save/E-mail Citation
Citation Format
E-mail Address
Subject
"British journal of ophthalmology"
 
OR
  • Show All  
  • Show My Selections 
Advanced Search

Search

111300 Ophthalmology and Optometry
110300 Clinical Sciences

Browse

  • By Title 
  • By Author/Creator 
  • By Department/Centre 
  • By Subject Keyword 
  • By Journal/Conference 
  • By FoR/RFCD codes 
  • By Resource Type 
  • By Date 

Highlights

  • Most Accessed Objects 
  • Recent Additions 
  • Pending Publications 
  • Author Profiles 

Resources

  • About ResearchOnline 
  • FAQ 
  • Open Access 
  • Open Access-FAQs 
  • Copyright 
  • Contribute 
  • Help 
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions 
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Powered by VITAL

Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J

Library Staff Sign In