Macquarie Home | Course Handbook | Library | Campus Map | Macquarie Contacts
Home page

Macquarie University ResearchOnline

Home
Add
-List Of Titles -A Comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/119133

OpenURL Link
60 Visitors 67 Hits 1 Downloads
Title
A Comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters
Related
British journal of ophthalmology, Vol. 87, Issue 6 (2003), p.690-694
DOI
10.1136/bjo.87.6.690
Publisher
BMJ Group
Date
2003
FoR/RFCD Code(s)
110300 Clinical Sciences  111300 Ophthalmology and Optometry
Author/Creator
Landers, John
Author/Creator
Sharma, Alok
Author/Creator
Goldberg, Ivan
Author/Creator
Graham, Stuart
Description
Background: The Humphrey field analyser (HFA), Humphrey-Zeiss frequency doubling perimeter, and the Medmont automated perimeter (MAP) are three commonly used automated perimeters with threshold achromatic methodologies. Visual field loss may be detected earlier with strategies that target cell lines with reduced redundancy or which suffer selective damage. Method: To compare these three perimeters, 63 subjects who were glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertensives, glaucoma patients, or normal controls were recruited selectively. All subjects underwent testing using MAP central threshold, MAP flicker perimetry, HFA full threshold, HFA SITA perimetry, HFA short wavelength perimetry (SWAP), and frequency doubling perimetry (FDP). After visual field testing, equivalent tests were compared: MAP central threshold with HFA full threshold and HFA SITA perimetry; Medmont flicker perimetry with HFA SWAP and FDP. Results: On analysis of the MAP central threshold a kappa statistic and an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.90 and 0.94, respectively, were found compared with HFA full threshold strategies, and 0.87 and 0.92 respectively, compared with HFA SITA. For MAP flicker a kappa statistic and an AUC of 0.65 and 0.81, respectively, were found compared with HFA SWAP and 0.87 and 0.96, respectively, compared with FDP. A quadrant analysis and comparison of mean defect between tests was also highly significant. Conclusion: Medmont and Humphrey perimeters correlated well; both may be used for clinical and research purposes with similar confidence.
Description
5 page(s)
Subject Keyword
110300 Clinical Sciences
Subject Keyword
111300 Ophthalmology and Optometry
Resource Type
journal article
Organisation
Macquarie University. Australian School of Advanced Medicine

Identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/119133
Identifier
ISSN:0007-1161
Identifier
mq-rm-2008003721
Language
eng
Reviewed
Reviewed
Save/E-mail Citation
Citation Format
E-mail Address
Subject
"British journal of ophthalmology"
 
OR
  • Show All  
  • Show My Selections 
Advanced Search

Search

111300 Ophthalmology and Optometry
110300 Clinical Sciences

Browse

  • By Title 
  • By Author/Creator 
  • By Department/Centre 
  • By Subject Keyword 
  • By Journal/Conference 
  • By FoR/RFCD codes 
  • By Resource Type 
  • By Date 

Highlights

  • Most Accessed Objects 
  • Recent Additions 
  • Pending Publications 
  • Author Profiles 

Resources

  • About ResearchOnline 
  • FAQ 
  • Open Access 
  • Open Access-FAQs 
  • Copyright 
  • Contribute 
  • Help 
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions 
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Powered by VITAL

Copyright Macquarie University | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Information

ABN 90 952 801 237 | CRICOS Provider No 00002J

Library Staff Sign In